Epistemology of Deliberation
מתוך The Phnomenologic Cage
(הבדלים בין גרסאות)
| (2 גרסאות ביניים של משתמש אחד אינן מוצגות) | |||
| שורה 1: | שורה 1: | ||
| − | + | <div dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"> | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
What is the problem we are trying to solve? | What is the problem we are trying to solve? | ||
Why the reader will want to read the paper? | Why the reader will want to read the paper? | ||
| שורה 14: | שורה 14: | ||
* What is an epistemic value? | * What is an epistemic value? | ||
** | ** | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
גרסה אחרונה מתאריך 00:44, 4 ביולי 2012
What is the problem we are trying to solve?
Why the reader will want to read the paper?
For me the essence of the problem is solved, but not to the reader. I'll have to take him through the question, and then solve it step by step.
Problems that can be seen in deliberation:
- Synchronization of of fields of knowledge.
- Disagreements
- Different world views
- Struggle for power in role of the majority.
- What is an epistemic value?
